Study Finds 109 Chemicals in Pregnant Women

A new study published in Environmental Science and Technology has detected 109 chemicals in pregnant women. Of the 109 chemicals, 55 have never been reported in people before. The chemicals were found both in the pregnant women and their children, indicating the chemicals travel through the placenta.

Scientists used high-resolution mass spectrometry to detect man-made chemicals in people. Of the chemicals that had not yet been identified in people:

  • One is used as a pesticide
  • Two are PFASs
  • Two are used in cosmetics
  • Four are used in high production volume (HPV) chemicals
  • Ten are plasticizers

It’s very concerning that we are unable to identify the uses or sources of so many of these chemicals. EPA must do a better job of requiring the chemical industry to standardize its reporting of chemical compounds and uses. And they need to use their authority to ensure that we have adequate information to evaluate potential health harms and remove chemicals from the market that pose a risk.

Study finds evidence of 55 new chemicals in people

Using organic products and eating organic foods can limit the amount of chemicals in the body. Check out this article for more information on detoxing through diet.

Recommended: How To Detoxify and Heal From Vaccinations – For Adults and Children



Phthalates Can Impair Children’s Brain Development

Research done by Project TENDR (Targeting Environmental Neuro-Developmental Risks) has shown that exposure to phthalates can be detrimental to children’s neurological development.

The American Journal of Public Health published Project TENDR’s peer-reviewed article where they’ve come to the conclusion that exposure to phthalates can impair brain development. The data showed an association between exposure to phthalates and an increased risk of learning, attention, and behavioral disorders. More than 30 studies from 11 different countries have shown similar results.

Recent data showed that 90% of those tested in Norway had plasticizers in their urine. Another study showed that children born from mothers in the highest quintile of urinary phthalate levels during their second trimester were three times more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD compared to children with mothers in the lowest quintile.

Phthalates are commonly found in food packaging and equipment for food production, as well as cosmetic products. Because they are so common in cosmetics, women are often exposed to higher levels of phthalates than men.

The mechanisms behind phthalates’ harms are varied, but the chemicals are known to disrupt organization and function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, the system responsible for the management of stress and involved in the regulation of immune function and metabolic homeostasis. They may also inhibit fetal testosterone production and may also have antiestrogenic effects, which could have repercussions for brain plasticity.

Phthalates Are Damaging Babies’ Brains

To reduce your exposure to phthalates, avoid plastic products as much as possible and eat a diet that aids in detoxification, with lots of salads and cranberry lemonade.




The History of Twilight Birth

The choice of where and how to have a baby should be up to each individual mother. There are benefits and drawbacks to all different kinds of births depending on a number of factors.

For a healthy mom and a healthy baby, we tend to favor a natural home birth, but it’s not for everyone. I personally favor home birth for the freedom it allows the mother and the baby. Additionally, childbirth in hospitals has a long and dark history, and often times do not have the mother or baby’s best interest in mind.

Before hospitals, we were obviously delivering babies at home. So why did we stop? How did childbirth go from being a natural, fairly simple process to being a health emergency?

Related: Circumcision, the Primal Cut – A Human Rights Violation

Childbirth in Native American tribes/prior to western colonization

Prior to western colonization, women gave birth with minimal problems as well as minimal recovery time. A healthy woman could deliver her own baby, recover quickly, and resume a normal life almost immediately.

When we promote at-home birth, this is the model we try to strive for. Birth in Native American tribes appears to be the most natural example of birth we’ve got on record. It would also be safe to say that prior to the colonization of North America, Native Americans had a much healthier lifestyle than the white man.

There is little to no data recorded about what childbirth was like, how often mothers died, and how often babies died in birth. It has however, been reported that women often returned back to normal life very quickly after childbirth.

depart alone to a secluded place near a brook, or stream of water . . . and prepare a shelter for themselves with mats and coverings, where, provided with provisions necessary for them, they await their delivery without the company or aid of any person. . . . They rarely are sick from child-birth [and] suffer no inconveniences from the same.

Native American customs of childbirth

At home birth prior to hospitals after colonization

Until the mid-early 20th century, home birth was still the norm. Women gave birth at home and births were attended by female relatives and midwives.

Related: How To Detoxify and Heal From Vaccinations – For Adults and Children

Birth was usually painful, and difficult and both mothers and babies often died during childbirth. Your risk of dying from childbirth was generally around 1-2% per child. Women that had seven or eight children (as many women did) had a much higher chance of dying from childbirth. Additionally, there was about a 20% chance that your child wouldn’t make it to their fifth birthday.

As early as the mid 18th century we saw an increase in doctors attending childbirth as opposed to midwives. The logic was that doctors had more training about anatomy and were thus more qualified to deliver children.

Wealthy women began looking for more pain-free alternatives to traditional childbirth in the late 19th century. In 1900 half of babies were still delivered by midwives. By 1935 only 15% of babies were delivered by midwives.

Hospital births became more commonplace in the mid-early 20th century after the push for pain relief during labor. In the 19th century, prior to twilight sleep, other drugs were used to help eases the pain of childbirth. Most commonly, chloroform was commonly used to help ease pain, but prior to chloroform, ether was used in the 1840s. Later Chloroform was popularized by Queen Victoria, in 1853 when she gave birth to her eighth child.

What Is Twilight Sleep?

Giving birth in hospitals became widely popular in the early 20th century. Prior to a push for hospital births, we saw more and more doctors attending home births. It was said that doctors were more equipped to deliver babies, as they had actual medical training, and a better understanding of anatomy, compared to midwives who often learned the trade from their mothers, or from giving birth themselves. This eventually led to more births in hospitals.

Additionally, poorer and middle-class families began giving birth in hospitals for sanitary reasons. Houses were often crowded and dirty, not an ideal place to give birth. Hospitals were also sometimes cheaper than a professional midwife.

Shortly after the popularization of childbirth in hospitals, twilight sleep became popular.

Twilight sleep is a form of childbirth that was labeled as painless, due to the drugs women in labor were given. Women were often given a mixture of scopolamine and morphine to reduce pain and put them in a state of semi-consciousness or unconsciousness.

Twilight sleep was developed by German doctors in the early 20th century. Wealthy German women would travel from all over Germany to give birth under twilight sleep. Women would travel to the clinic as early as a month before childbirth to allow doctors time to figure out the proper dosage of medication in order to assure women experienced painless childbirth.

When American doctors began the practice of twilight sleep themselves, they did not take the time to assure each woman was given the proper dosage of medication. The twilight sleep drugs were treated as a one size fits all. Additionally, doctors in America often did not have the proper medical training to go through the medical procedures necessary for a successful twilight sleep birth.

Women were often tied down to beds and left alone for hours at a time. Other times they were left in a room with many other women also in labor. Twilight sleep didn’t actually make labor painless, often women would thrash and scream in pain and would then come back to consciousness after birth and have no memory of the pain, or the delivery itself.

After labor, women often had difficulty bonding with their babies, difficulty breastfeeding, and severe postpartum depression. Women also had very traumatic memories of childbirth if they were able to remember the experience.

Twilight birth was popularized around the time of the women’s suffrage movement, with a push for more painless alternatives to natural childbirth. Later, in the 60s, following the hippie movement, there was a push for natural childbirth once again as women learned more about the horrors of twilight sleep.

Recommended: Best Supplements To Kill Candida and Everything Else You Ever Wanted To Know About Fungal Infections 

Modern births in hospitals

Today when we think of childbirth, especially in the U.S, we usually think of birth in a hospital, with a woman hooked up to IVs stuck in a bed under fluorescent lights. That was the vision of childbirth that was presented to me for many years, and it was not something I wanted to experience.

Modern day birth in a hospital it generally not as disconnected from nature as it was in its peak in the 1950s. There are generally options for the mother, such as water birth or natural child birth with no epidural.

That being said, often times in a hospital you’re under a time limit. If you don’t give birth in a certain amount of time you may be given drugs to induce labor, or you may have to undergo a c-section.

With the possibility of a C-section, women are not allowed to eat or drink anything except ice chips, when in labor. Additionally women are often times constrained to the bed and are not supposed to move around.

Of course, there’s also the atmosphere of the hospital. Hospitals are very sterile, less than welcoming environments. Nurses and doctors are constantly coming and going, and overall it can be an unfamiliar uncomfortable environment to give birth in.

Many hospitals in the U.S have extremely high rates of c-sections (some up to 50%). The CDC recommends that C-section rates stay around 15%, where the World Health Organization recommends no more than 10%. The current national average is around 34%.

The pain of childbirth is one of the biggest concerns today that goes into rather women want to have natural childbirth or use medical intervention. While an epidural may temporarily relieve the pain of childbirth, upwards of 35% of women who have an epidural experience hindered ability to breastfeed, difficulty to bond with the baby, or difficulty recovering after pregnancy.

Compared to women who give birth at home, women in hospitals have a higher rate of intervention (c-section, epidural, etc). Women in hospitals have higher rates of postpartum infections and higher rates of postpartum hemorrhages.

At home births today

The reality is, we’ve been doing childbirth at home longer than we’ve been doing it in hospitals! When I think of being pregnant and giving birth now I can’t possibly imagine being in a hospital or really anywhere other than the comfort of my own home.

Many studies show that at home birth is safer than hospital birth, in many cases. Home births have less of a chance of C-section, hemorrhage, infant distress, and infection, to name a few.

Today, around 1% of births are home births in the U.S.

At home births allow you to be completely in control and in charge of the decisions that are being made (provided you have a midwife who works well and communicates with you or you do an unassisted home birth).

The moment baby is born you have the opportunity for skin-to-skin contact for as long as you and baby need. There’s no risk of medical interference (20 years ago when I was born, doctors took me away and gave me antibiotics against my parents’ will). You have time to ensure the natural progression of childbirth as it should happen, rather than on a hospital timeline, and without hospital intervention.

For a healthy mother who’s had a healthy pregnancy, a home birth will probably be your healthiest option. At home, you have the ability to allow your body to give birth in its most natural state. Allowing your body to give birth in its own time, naturally in whatever way works best for your body is the best thing for you and your baby.

Sources



Moderna Begins Testing Covid-19 Vaccine On Children

Fifty-three million doses of the Moderna vaccine have been administered to Americans. On Tuesday, March 16th Moderna announced that they will begin vaccine trials on children ages six months to 12 years old.

Moderna is set to enroll with 6,750 pediatric participants in the U.S and Canada. The study will be broken into two parts. Part one will test participants ages 2-12 years old, in two doses. Part two will test participants ages six months to two years old in one of three dose levels.

Children in the study will be followed for 12 months after their second vaccine dose. A similar trial was started by Moderna in December of 2020, with 3,000 children aged 12-18.

We project that high school students will very likely be able to be vaccinated by the fall term, maybe not the very first day, but certainly in the early part of the fall for that fall educational term. Elementary school kids, we’re doing this what’s called age de-escalation studies to make sure it’s safe and immunogenic in them. They likely will be able to get vaccinated by the very first quarter of 2022.

-Anthony Fauci

Related: How To Detoxify and Heal From Vaccinations – For Adults and Children

It has already been shown that children are not the primary spreaders of the coronavirus. Additionally, previous trials have shown that side effects for the vaccine are even more severe for younger people.




Research Shows Masks Can Impair Babies Speech and Language Development

The coronavirus pandemic has changed many aspects of everyday life, and with covid-19 cases being front-page news, many of the repercussions of trying to combat the pandemic, have been swept under the rug.

New research has shown that wearing masks can impair children’s speech and language development as they begin to see and hear communicative signals. Babies of different ages were shown videos of people talking while their attention was tracked with an eye-tracking device.

Recommended: How To Detoxify and Heal From Vaccinations – For Adults and Children

Researchers discovered that babies begin to lip-read around eight months old, corresponding with development in their own language skills. This indicates that babies begin lip reading when they become interested in language and speech.

Crucially, once lip-reading emerges in infancy, it becomes the default mode of speech processing whenever comprehension is difficult. This is illustrated by our latest studies in which my Spanish colleagues, their graduate student Joan Birules and I found that 4–6 year-old bilingual children lip-read more when they are confronted with speech in an unfamiliar than in a familiar language.

Masks Can Be Detrimental to Babies’ Speech and Language Development

Beyond eight months, babies and children use visual speech cues to understand what people are saying. Obviously, visible speech cues are undetectable with masks. Unfortunately, not all parents are in a position to stay at home with their children all the time, and many children are spending most of their time with care providers who are often masked for the entire day.

Related: How To Detoxify and Heal From Vaccinations – For Adults and Children



New Study Shows Many Infants Are Lacking Important Gut Bacteria

A new study from Stanford University and the University of Nebraska shows that many newborns are lacking important gut bacteria. Many newborns are missing beneficial bacteria to help them get all the nutritional benefits of breast milk.

C-sections, antibiotics, and formula milk are all said to be part of the problem. Researchers examined bacteria from hundreds of babies of different ages, locations, and diets (formula, breastfed, and mixed).

Related: Circumcision Linked to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Overall, this survey revealed that, on average, infants in the US have a low abundance of Bifidobacterium, a high abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria carrying high levels of ARGs, as well as limited capacity of metabolizing HMOs from breast milk. These findings were widespread in infants in the US, independent of location, age, and diet.

Metagenomic insights of the infant microbiome community structure and function across multiple sites in the United States

Along with breast milk digestion, this bacteria has been shown to be important for healthy immune system development.

Related: How to Eliminate IBS, IBD, Leaky Gut



Study Shows Antibiotics At an Early Age Linked to Health Conditions Later In Life

A new study has linked antibiotics in children under two, to illnesses and conditions later in life. Children under the age of two who received one dose of antibiotics were more likely to develop asthma, eczema, hay fever, food allergies, celiac disease, ADD, ADHD, and obesity, or general weight problems. Multiple doses of antibiotics were linked to multiple conditions. Conditions differed depending on the child’s age, gender, type of medication, dose, and number of doses.

“When antibiotics were first developed and deployed, the overwhelming consideration was control of pathogens. We now realize that their widespread application has considerable collateral effect on the microbiome, which may be of special importance in developing children,”

Antibiotic use in babies linked to allergies, asthma and other conditions, study finds

The study, published in Mayo Clinic proceedings, analyzed data from more than 14,500 children. Data showed that 70% of the children in the study received at least one antibiotic. Between one and two antibiotics prescriptions was linked to a higher risk of asthma and celiac disease in girls. Three to four antibiotic doses were linked to higher cases of asthma, atopic dermatitis, and excess weight gain in females, and obesity in boys. Babies who received five or more prescriptions were more likely to develop asthma, allergic rhinitis, obesity, and ADHD.

Antibiotics wipe out all your gut bacteria, both good and bad. Antibiotics at an early age can wipe out critical gut bacteria that you never get back. Read this article to learn how to detoxify from antibiotics.